This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion below. - GTBacchus(talk) 20:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom as uncontroversial disambiguation. No clear primary usage for either film. PC78 (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this title is ambiguous with more than one film articles about films of the same title. BOVINEBOY2008 19:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - we shouldn't be forced to pick and choose which films have a priority over a name. What's popular this instance might not be later on. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.