Talk:All China Lawyers Association

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion???[edit]

NJGW requested for speedy deletion and resorted to Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion General criteria 11: Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. This request is wrong. The content of this article has nothing about advertising. Please note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion. All China Lawyers Association is an organization at the same level with American Bar Association. I cannot understand why someone thinks it is advertising. --Neo-Jay (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tags. My mistake. I was marking a lot of spam pages and marked this one by mistake. Please do try to expand the article though as it seems like it could make for an interesting and informative entry. NJGW (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. --Neo-Jay (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]