Talk:Allegheny National Forest

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Future work?[edit]

I am tempted to tag this for NPOV. The only mention of oil is in the intro, lumber is only sparsely mentioned. Those two issues alone have created a whirlwind of controversy surrounding ANF. None of this is mentioned here and the page offers little beyond what is available from USFS, not the most unbiased of sources, obviously. This page is something I would like to see improve and hope to devote some time to soon. Anyone else want to help? A little team and we could have this thing shining in no time. IvoShandor (talk) 14:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In fact, various sections of this article appear to be directly lifted from the USFS. Perhaps culling some of the promotional material tone of the different sections and adding a "forest health" or "controversies over resource extraction" section would help make this article more solid.WackyXaky (talk) 22:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought there may have been some direct copying. Both of those sections would be good to add. There are also several major bodies of water within ANF. There are three (?) areas of old-growth forest too. The addition of some solid numbers on oil and lumber would help along with the sections you mention. We'll have to see what we can do. I have dozens of photos of the forest, some of which I have freely licensed and added to Commons. I can add a few more if we find we are missing some photos of something we need, if we are, I may actually have a photo of it, we'll just have to see. IvoShandor (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lumbered by railroad, 4% of subsurface rights, & Rainbow Gatherings[edit]

Through research I did in the 80's, I learned that the original forest that was where ANF is located was extensively lumbered by railroad. Many of the trails in ANF are former railroad beds.

Also, the Federal Government only acquired about 4% of the subsurface rights. That helps explain while there are so many gas wells & gas pipes throughout ANF, as well as the occasional oil well.

There have been three National Rainbow Gatherings in ANF, twice at a site on Queen Creek upstream of Endeavor, Pennsylvania & once on Bear Creek not far from Ridgway, Pennsylvania.

Those are some suggestions for research. I, myself, am involved on other projects at this time. Aloha! Peaceray (talk) 05:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allegheny National Forest Dirtbiking[edit]

Please post time records for the different loops and photos of interesting things that happened at Allegheny National Forest, PA. (ex. Marienville Bike loop,etc...). Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlleghenyRider (talk • contribs) 18:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Allegheny National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mead Run versus Meade Run[edit]

Most sources that I have accessed overwhelmingly have it as Mead Run. I am referencing a USGS map, PA_Sheffield_221913_1966_24000_geo.tif, which has it as Mead Run. Downloaded from https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#13/41.6143/-79.0558. USGS is authoritative over USFS, & USFS lists it as Mead Run anyway in other places. I will post additional sources. Peaceray (talk) 06:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other sources listing Mead Run:

However, there appears to be a Mead Run, tributary to Tionesta Creek near Henry Mills, PA & a Meade Run, tributary to Kinzua Creek. near Westline, PA. Both are in Allegheny National Forest. I will contact the uploader of the image to determine the location, as there are no coordinates on the image. Since the creator has spelled it Mead Run, I think we should default to that editor until we receive word otherwise. Peaceray (talk) 07:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]