Talk:Alliance (Sweden)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm sorry, but I do believe that the article has been vandalized. Notice that "homosexual" was added to the article.

I think there will be a lot of that today. Thanks to the person who corrected the links on my revert.Notmyrealname 17:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that it is correct to call the Centre Party a centrist party any moore. The last few years, they have started to lean a lot to the right 134.176.196.203 (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alliance (Sweden). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies[edit]

I've removed the ideologies listed on the infobox (as was the case before). Parties in the coalition adhering to different views, and holding so many ideological viewpoints, the infobox is unreasonable. · | (talk - contributions) 17:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is or was?[edit]

My view is that as of 11 January 2019, the cooperation within the Alliance has effectively ceased on the national level. I suggest that the wording in this article should be changed to reflect that, i.e "The Alliance was a political alliance [...]" and so forth. I think consensus might need to be reached first, however. lovkal (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]