Talk:Almonia

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Lobi Moth"[edit]

I've removed the section claiming that Almonia lobipennis is the only carnivorous moth. The sources cited don't even mention this species that I could find, much less its unusual behavior. Besides that, no sources on the internet could be found to back up this claim except for one Yahoo Answers posting citing the 'kipedia. Sounds rather dubious. Apart from that, it wouldn't be the only carnivorous moth by a long shot—I'm aware that at least some caterpillars are insectivorous. Eris Discord | Talk 05:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Almonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006084857/http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx to http://globiz.pyraloidea.org/Pages/Reports/TaxonReport.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Acentropinae or Spilomelinae?[edit]

Acentropinae, species:Acentropinae, species:Almonia, and BioLib say Acentropinae.
Spilomelinae, species:Spilomelinae, and CoL say Spilomelinae.
EoL and GBIF don't place it in a subfamily.

jlwoodwa (talk) 07:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]