Talk:Alnwick RFC

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squad List[edit]

This is an unsourced and non notable list of non notable people. None of the references given have this information stated as they are individual match reports. It is WP:original research and synthesis and belongs on the clubs web site not an encyclopaedia entry. This is a local team playing in a local league and even the team itself is of only marginal notability. The individuals playing for it this season are not significant in the slightest. noq (talk) 07:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reference 9 is relevant it is a team lists with positions and point scored, west hartlepool RFC play in the same "local league" they have a squad list no body seems to mind on that page West Hartlepool R.F.C.

As I have repeatedly said and explained on the article talk page - random match reports do not reference that table. And you have failed to address the issue of why the table should exist at all in the article. Wikipedia is not the clubs own website and you are not allowed to treat it as the clubs website. There is no one in that least that is in any way notable, the table is WP:original research/WP:synth, and it is too much insignificant information. noq (talk) 11:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

those non notable players are the only reason there is a club I can find loads of rugby clubs wiki pages listing non notable players, how about you just leave the alnwick page alone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RugbyNE66 (talk • contribs) 11:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a justification. And of course without players the club would not exist - but where is the value to an encyclopaedia of included a particular seasons squad? Please also read WP:OWN. noq (talk) 11:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have still failed to provide any WP:reliable sources - please either do that or remove the table. As explained above, random match reports do not work as a reference to this table. noq (talk) 10:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still no response? Ignoring this issue will not make it go away. The table will be removed tomorrow if you cannot provide WP:reliable sources or any means of justifying why it should be here. noq (talk) 14:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

League Records[edit]

Once again, an anonymous editor has added this back again, without addressing the problems which caused it to be removed in the first place. It is WP:Original research and as such is not allowed in Wikipedia. Adding random news reports that sometimes mention one of the records does nothing to establish that it is current or accurate. Wikipedia is NOT the clubs website and this is not the place to publish such information. Repeated pleas to the anon to discuss the issue here have been ignored. noq (talk) 13:32, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Alnwick RFC.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]