Talk:Alzheimer Society of Canada

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Alzcanada (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Alzheimersociety (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

I have rated the article "start" class today because it needs rewriting in some areas (most notably, Programs and Services). It currently has an "advert" tag which I agree with. It also needs more inline citations and referencing. PK T(alk) 18:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advert Tag[edit]

I agree with the advert tag, but it should be noted that the advertisement phrasing is forgiveable since this is a non-profit charitable organization. If I have some time later, I'll attempt to rephrase the article to a more encyclopedic style than the current pamphlet-like style. LiamSP (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]