This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Amanda Spratt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Amanda Spratt is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
So I wanted to inquire about the crazy in-line citation deal. Do we really need to invoke reference #1 nineteen separate times...? Or references 2 and 3 ten times? I can understand maybe up to five, but there are several instances here when they're placed after almost every sentence, even ones that are right after another. Can't we just place them at the end of the relevant series of referenced sentences? Just saying. IShadowed(talk) 02:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to over cite everything. Extra ones can be removed and cleaned up to have fewer. --LauraHale (talk) 02:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and cleaned them up. I understand the tendency to over-reference DYK(+) material, but it can make articles difficult to read, especially interesting ones like this. Just didn't want new users/readers to be discouraged, I hope you understand :) IShadowed(talk) 02:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. :) Much appreciated. --LauraHale (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I put the prose back and then put the table in. There is no reason you can't have both, especially considering the table is absent sources and not complete. --LauraHale (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Spratt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
