Talk:Amarillo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Also a synonym for maduros?[edit]

Isn't "amarillos" also a synonym for maduros (a dish made from fried sweet plantains? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 March 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. After extended time for discussion, consensus in favor of the proposed move is clear. BD2412 T 18:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Amarillo (disambiguation)Amarillo – No clear primary topic between the city, plant and Is This the Way to. The city has 22,018 views but the plant has 15,655, Is This the Way to has 2,965, the episode has 1,472, the Gorillaz song has 146 and the J Balvin song has 101[[1]]. Google results are mixed between the city and Is This the Way to. Images is split between the city, colour (which isn't relevant in English as opposed to Spanish) and Is This the Way to is also there. In terms of long-term significance the city has long-term significance but the plant also has and Is This the Way to would probably also be better known though its a PTM and the name comes from the city. US cities are commonly referred to with the state which may mean readers searching with plain "Amarillo" are less likely to be looking for the city. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Amarillo per nom, but at the very least if this RM fails, redirect Amarillo to this page instead of to Amarillo, Texas. Aydoh8 (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'd like to see more reliable source evidence associating Amaryllis with "amarillo". The word is only mentioned once at Amaryllis, with no reference attached. A quick Google did not show that a link between the two is obvious. 162 etc. (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, I don't see much indication this is a plausible search term for amaryllis. If I search "amarillo plant" on Google I'm just redirected to amaryllis, and the few mentions of it are I find are usually "amarillo plant", not just "amarillo". And we can't seriously claim that a Neil Sedaka song about the city is a reasonable challenger to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The city is the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I am doubtful that the city is the primary topic, when "amarillo" is a color in Spanish and is the namesake of the city. Support dab as primary. Natg 19 (talk) 17:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per WP:DABDICT, the Spanish definition of the word is not a consideration. 162 etc. (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination, Aydoh8, Ortizesp and Natg 19. There are 12 entries listed upon the Amarillo (disambiguation) page, with little indication that the WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Texas' 14th-most-populous city dwarfs the combined notability of the 11 remaining entries. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 06:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Roman Spinner. ╠╣uw [talk] 09:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, on the basis, that this title is used already as merely a redirect, and not the article title of the Texan city itself, therefore no primary. If it were the primary topic it should've already had this title. DankJae 19:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.