Talk:Amelia (company)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York (state)

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removal of notability template[edit]

The article has at this point 21 citations from different sources as The Wall Street Journal, PC World, The Economist, Computer World, Yahoo! Finance, Credit Suisse, and Daily Mail. I believe these sources all-together are way beyond the minimum necessary to pass the notability criteria. Therefore I am removing the {{notability}} stub and informing @Kb.au:, whom originally added such.

If there's need for further improvements at citation w.r.t. to notability let's take the discussion here before any actions are taken. Regards. Pcgomes (talk) 10:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 January 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Amelia (company). (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 04:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IPsoft → Amelia, an IPsoft Company – The company underwent a rebrand in October of 2020. The move will reflect the company's new legal name. See link: https://amelia.com/2020/10/01/ipsoft-honors-pioneering-spirit-of-conversational-ai-innovation-with-rebrand-to-amelia/ Juanmartinez091082 (talk) 17:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose: Wikipedia uses common names, not promotional official names, and that name has a very artificial ring to it. I suggest keeping it where it is or considering Amelia (company). The name seems to imply that IPsoft is a larger entity that now includes Amelia as a subsidiary, so perhaps the article should just stay where it is in order to cover the entire enterprise. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to Amelia (company). The company seems to actually call itself "Amelia, an IPsoft Company" nowadays but as User:BarrelProof says it feels artificial. JIP | Talk 21:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amelia (company). "an IPsoft Company" is a stylation we should ignore. 75.162.124.147 (talk) 02:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.