Talk:American GI Forum

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American GI Forum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Mexican-Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Mexican-Americans task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

broken link[edit]

The link to the GI Forum website is broken. 205.208.8.161 (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican American to Hispanic[edit]

As the AGIF is no longer solely a Mexican-American veterans organization but one advocating on behalf of all Hispanic veterans, I have changed that portion of the introduction. Of course, I left the history portion the same except to add that AGIF currently advocates on behalf of all Hispanic veterans.The Original Historygeek (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is in part the changing terminology of the 1900s regarding Latinos in the Southwestern U.S. The 'othering' of the Hispanics, Tejanos, Mestizos and aboriginal peoples began in the early to mid-1800s and the Mexican Revolution brought in large numbers of refugees into the Southwest; this help labeling them all as 'Mexicans', even though some descended from people that were only citizens of Mexico for as little 15yrs. These factors played into the larger Anglo population referring to all of them as 'Mexicans'. This labeling did not begin to be thrown off until the late 1960s and the rise of the Chicano movement when people began to name themselves and the larger society began to respond, did such modern terms become common place and Mexican-American become a term used only for a smaller and more specific group from the research I've been doing.C. W. Gilmore (talk) 14:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a new section on the fights that are still happening?[edit]

The American G.I. Forum filed a federal lawsuit against the Normanna Cemetery Association charges that they violated State and Federal long-standing civil rights protections when it refused Dorothy Barrera in February of 2016, because her husband was 'Mexican' and not allowed burial in the city cemetery.[The American G.I. Forum filed a federal lawsuit against the Normanna Cemetery Association charges that they violated long-standing civil rights protections when it refused Dorothy Barrera in February of 2016, because her husband was 'Mexican' and not allowed burial in the city cemetery.[1][2][3][4][5]C. W. Gilmore (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a section on civil rights work, starting with attempts to secure equal access to veterans benefits, the Longoria Affair and current issues like fighting segregation in cemeteries; if no one objects.C. W. Gilmore (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]