Talk:American modernism

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Hello everyone, I just added a sentence MAAnglistikBielefeld 08:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)ARW[reply]

Well, I have just removed the kitchen section, to which you added two different sections based on copyright material. This is not acceptable here. Charles Matthews 20:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to mention that this section seems very out of sync with the modernism page, linked above the article. I'm not an expert, but unless American Modernism is an entirely different movement than 'European' Modernism (which is entirely possible), than this page should be restructured.

For example, the Modernism page says "Modernism rejected the lingering certainty of Enlightenment thinking, and also that of the existence of a compassionate, all-powerful Creator.[4][5]" but the American Modernism page specifically states that Modernism was an outgrowth of enlightenment thinking.

File:Weehawken Sequence John Marin.jpeg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

	An image used in this article, File:Weehawken Sequence John Marin.jpeg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on American modernism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070205115813/http://www.time.com:80/time/time100/artists/profile/chaplin.html to http://www.time.com/time/time100/artists/profile/chaplin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on American modernism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Influence of technology[edit]

I think what this article focuses on mainly, especially in "Everyday life and culture" is product of technological advancements, not the product modernism itself. Lot of work is needed on this article.Sourcerery (talk) 11:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

Block evasion by sock

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I was drawn to this article through citation needed tag in fashion and furniture section. Researched it and found nothing, I also saw alleged references at bottom of page for broader section "Everyday life and culture" of which Fashion was part. On further inspection I can confirm that those references make no mention of modernism in general or American modernism which is particular point of interest for this article. Aocdnw (talk) 00:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original research sections[edit]

Upon closer examination I have determined that following sections are OR

Jazz,
Feminism, gender, and sexuality,
American icons in European mind,
Everyday life and culture.

Sections that do have references, have references that make no mention of modernism yet alone American modernism and neither do main articles for some of those section. Material in article does not explain how and why are these topics relevant to article and how they relate to modernism in general. Further, some references have no obvious connection to section they are in, for example Stieglitz, A. (1997): Alfred Stieglitz. Cologne: Könemann. in Feminism, gender, and sexuality is weird since Stieglitz is photographer. All these things has led me to conclude this sections are Original research.

Sections that appear to belong in article but lack references[edit]

Those sections would be History and Architecture and space. Since they appear to be written by same editor as OR sections, little OR and Synthesis is highly probable in those sections as well.

Generally OK sections with established connection to topic[edit]

That sections are Visual arts and American modernist literature but some subsections still lack references and because of things previously discussed should be checked for OR and Synthesis. Aocdnw (talk) 13:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]