Talk:Ames Project/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 03:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my review comments. They are mostly typos, but I'll let you fix them. Djmaschek (talk) 04:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction: Consider adding an infobox, though I'm not sure which one would be appropriate. Or, argue persuasively why the article does not need one. (I see that the Metallurgical Laboratory article does not have an infobox.)
If there is one that would be appropriate, I will add it to both articles Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to insist on this one. There seems to be none that fits. Djmaschek (talk) 03:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Organization, paragraph 1, last sentence: associate directory > director.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ames Process, paragraph 2, first sentence: oxide could > oxide that could.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Production, paragraph 1: Metallurgical; Lab > Metallurgical Lab.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Production, paragraph 4, sentence 2: But it also harder > But it was also harder.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Production, paragraph 4: of1,500 > of 1,500.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chemistry: paragraph 1, sentence 2: There is no verb. Please fix.
Y Corrected Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]