Talk:Amphiuma

	Amphiuma is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kingkl, Kuponya, Biologicalamphibian. Peer reviewers: Kingkl.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Why is it called a "Congo eel" if it resides in the southeastern United States? -Alex, 12.220.157.93 22:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Because people come up with all kinds of local nicknames. Amphiumas are also called "Conger eels" in some places, which is an actual species of marine eel. MFuture 22:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which "Congo" are we refering to, btw? The river, the general area, the people, one of the countries? --Palnatoke 08:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it refers to the Congo the river, people or country -- I suspect it's slang for the Congaree River. I found this that claims that the two-toed amphiuma can be found in the vicinity of Congaree National Park. --71.76.39.125 (talk) 03:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy[edit]

Re this section: "They are also known as "Congo eels" or "Congo snakes", which are zoologically incorrect designations." - What makes "congo eel" zoologically incorrect? According to the Integrated Taxonomic Information Service, Congo eel is a valid common name. Just curious... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.168.138.58 (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That they aren't actually eels, presumably. An accepted name, but an inaccurate one, like slow worm or mantis shrimp. Daibhid C (talk) 20:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vestigial organs[edit]

Are the Amphiuma's legs vestigial? Do they have any use? The article just explains that they're very tiny (and the picture puts it into perspective)... So I have a hard time thinking they'd be able to move its body at all. Elecbullet (talk) 07:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please, no creation v. evolution debates.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amphiuma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120914055345/http://www.scientificblogging.com/genomicron/junk_dna_and_the_onion_test to http://www.scientificblogging.com/genomicron/junk_dna_and_the_onion_test

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]