Talk:Amsterdammertje

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAmsterdammertje was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 4, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 10, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the typical Amsterdammertjes (pictured) that line the streets of Amsterdam will be gradually removed?
Current status: Delisted good article

Good article nomination[edit]

Well, it met standards, but I think that someone who definately knows how to pronounce it should put a phonetic explaination at the beginning of the article, as other articles do.--Dark Green 00:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the pronunciation. – Editør (talk) 13:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Giant metal phallus[edit]

I'm surprised there is no mention of the unavoidable fact that they look like giant, red penises. As apropos as this is for Amsterdam's red light district, there should be some explanation as to why they were designed like this. I mean, there's a hole on the top and everything. This can't be by accident, can it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jhornischfeger (talkcontribs) 01:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I don't know how to put this... Yes, it can. It's rather easy to make something look like a penis by accident. If you want to put a claim in the article that Amsterdammertjes were designed to look like penises, find a source. The observation that they're phallic, while rather obvious, hasn't had enough independent mention to be notable AFAICT. 194.151.6.70 08:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Amsterdammertjes originally were cannon tubes (and they were fatter), which explains their shape. The hole on top is probably functional or a production artifact, but I can't find anything about it on the web. --Jjdmol (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

capitalization[edit]

This word is used lowercase in Dutch. However I'm not sure if it's used in this article as an English loanword? If not, it should be lowercased throughout. "Amsterdammertje" is the diminutive form for "a person from Amsterdam" not the traffic bollard referred to in this article. --Azertus (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amsterdammertje. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]