Talk:Anderson Street station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAnderson Street station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 15, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Permit parking[edit]

Permit parking is operated by the City of Hackensack.

I don't think so. I park there every day and I pay a Pennsylvania outfit called Park America for the privilege.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anderson Street (NJT station)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did a few small copyedit things. But:

  • The NJT link to the station is dead
Its really hard to figure their links out, don't ask me why.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 14:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't quite see the relevance of the other two external links.
All removed.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 14:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does the book or another source say what architectural style the building is in?
Done, basically.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 14:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you add something on travel time/distance to Secaucus Junction and/or Hoboken Terminal, and perhaps the number of weekday services.
There's no need to mention the amount, only because every train all week serves the station. None skip the station, and that's been mentioned.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 14:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added travel times.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 14:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise all looks good, but I'll place it on hold until the above is looked into. Arsenikk (talk) 09:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 11:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should the category Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2009 be added to note the building's destruction. An additional category can be added once a new structure is completed, if it isn't already. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]