Talk:Andrew Bennett (academic)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ideas for development[edit]

Reception[edit]

  • Good start to this article, IMO. I think we need a "reception" section where the various reactions to his appointment can be presented. From what I have noticed so far, on the positive side, he is considered a wide thinker rather than a "narrow fundamentalist". On the negative side, his adherence to the Christian faith reinforces the concern that Christians will be given favor.DonaldRichardSands (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is done as you mentioned above and proper citations are mentioned for those points of view, i don't see a problem to add this section... --Ntb613 (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

Which reference confirms his middle names as beginning with "P. W."?--Launchballer 13:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This qualifies I think,
DonaldRichardSands (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've added it to the article.--Launchballer 21:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Bennett (academic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]