Talk:Anglo-Zanzibar War/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Yep, I agree with you. I will look at that as well and maybe swap the sides - Dumelow (talk) 07:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, a very interesting article on an interesting and bizarre topic. Incidentally, the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography has an article on Lloyd Mathews. If you have access I recommend putting an article together to complement this one. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)