Talk:Anim8or

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Animation: Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Gallery[edit]

I removed this section for now. All the images need to be hosted on Wikipedia, but more importantly, we don't have the rights to use them here. You could try contact the artist and ask them to release them on here, though. Aero 04:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anim8or&direction=next&oldid=59172405#Gallery 'FL a RN'(talk) 00:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raytracer[edit]

Does and one have a source saying steve plans to add a raytracer? I haven't heard any thing about that and sinc it's a surface modeler I doubt he has any plans to add a raytracer. -Glorfon

If I remember correctly Steve planned to include a rudimentary raytracer in 0.95 but had to push it back because it wasn't ready at release time. —Scott5114 ↗ 23:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misconcepting Picture example[edit]

The picture displaying a rendered "Nintendo" remote control actually has the layout of a Playstation 1 remote. Not only is it slightly humorous, but it's grossly misrepresenting. Opt for a newly rendered example. BH 7-9-07

Actually, technically, that game controller is only similar to the PS1 remote. If you compare it to actual PS1 remotes, you will see there are some shape differences, minor button inconsistencies, etc. The remote in the image essentially does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:BA00:7EC:41E7:25D5:D305:87C3 (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like advertisement?[edit]

Why would you rewrite an entire article just because it's about a good program? Are we supposed to present a couple good things about it, then spend the rest of the article bashing it? No. There has hardly been any criticism against it. Hardly any for it. Why? It's pretty much unknown compared to giants like 3DS Max, Maya, and Blender, among other modlelers. Anyway, back to that template glued over the whole page. There are very few bad things about Anim8or, thus you can't write something about it without using mostly positive points. Anyone in favor of removing the template sign here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

TheGreenMartian (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that you're supposed to critisize it. The point is that instead of saying, for example, "this is cost-effective", you have to say "This costs ____, which is far lower than the next price of ____". I know that's not a very good example, there are better ones at one of the Wikipedia pages, I forget the name. But the point is, you have to explain why something is something instead of just saying it is something.

HaiyaTheWin (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anim8or. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214230909/http://www.anim8or.com:80/news/index.html to http://www.anim8or.com/news/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]