Talk:Ann Graham

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Anthroponymy

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it does not match the criteria: three is one extant article and a number of linked redlinks, ie., the page is useful to prevent real confusion. --- üser:Altenmann >t 16:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC) .P.S. In any case, if deleted, the entries must be moved into Graham page. Some of them are not there. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SNUGGUMS, when you nominate a page for deletion, you should inform the creator (in this case, me). Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION - this contains many valid entries. There is no rule that a dab needs to have pages with their own articles. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If there's only one entry notable enough for its own article, though, a DAB isn't necessary. Same for if there's only two notable entries and one of them is the primary topic. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, there are no guidelines that say that a dab should be deleted if it doesn't contain topics notable enough for an article. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]