Talk:Annapolis Conference

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"End of talks"?[edit]

WHY DOES THIS PAGE NOT TELL US HOW THE TALKS ENDED? 94.174.120.132 (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Mideast"?[edit]

Who says "mideast" except American newspapers? It's the Middle East, and so the article should be at 2007 Middle East peace conference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.179.71.70 (talk) 07:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I support the name Annapolis peace conference. It's most spreaded among the media.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think 'Annapolis Conference' or 'Annapolis Summit' would be good, but either way, the title should definitely mention the location. That would correspond with our names for previous peace conferences (e.g. Madrid Conference, Oslo Accords, Taba Summit). Terraxos (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any rhyme or reason to the invitees?[edit]

Just curious...Looking at the Haaretz partial list, some of the invited countries/organizations make sense, but some have me scratching my head. Why the invite to Australia? The Vatican? Norway? Brazil? Anybody have any insight on that point?--68.38.103.203 (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to some analysts, it's a bid by Bush to show that his efforts are supported by lots of well-liked and important countries. —Nightstallion 18:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand it may also have something to do with possible aid -- SAB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.56.15 (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Validity of the Map[edit]

I understand China was involved, but Taiwan is also colored in, and I haven't been able to find a reference to it. Maybe I'm missing something? Or is that a mistake?

Farkeld 21:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, since this was deleted this the last time I asked this, who cares what Noam Chomsky has to say about this? Why is he at all relevant? -Dan Lyons, motiongraphics81 at yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.165.53.72 (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Annapolis Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

strange postings[edit]

The German rightwing, islamophobic and pro-Israel website "Heplev-abseits vom Mainstream" run by the schoolteacher Herbert Eiteneiner is famous for its relentless propaganda. Within the previous weeks Eiteneiner reissued a number of articles from the past- many of them defaming the Annapolis Conference- as a reminder that anything from the Clinton era was bad. Does anyone know whether anything like that takes place in the USA, too? I should not be surprised that all that has to do with mudslinging against Hillary Clinton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:79:AE74:B101:7977:5013:3250:284E (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Annapolis Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Annapolis Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition of Israel as a Jewish State[edit]

The article does not mention one of the most contentious demands of Israel, which was that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish State[1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exjerusalemite (talkcontribs) 08:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]