Talk:Anne-Marie Slaughter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

If this doesn't say "I want to be Secretary of State"...http://americaabroad.tpmcafe.com/node/29605 I guess she realized some of her previous screeds might not look so good if she is nominated.

Houseofmalaise--you really shouldn't take out relevant information just because it shows what Slaughter is really like.

OK Houseofmalaise at first I thought you just were a fan of hers. Now I know you're dishonest. You KNOW she didn't say she changed her opinion yet you put that in there. Completely made up. Twice. An account from someone who was presumably there in the article you took out: Regarding Slaughter's blatant double-standard, Princeton student Daniel Mark, former president of the Center for Jewish Life, suggests she remove offensive "Ricanstructions" elements "or articulate principles based on which she can justify sponsoring art that is offensive to Catholics when, by her own admission, she would not sponsor some other forms of offensive art." I've changed it and people can judge for themselves. Or, e-mail her, tell her what a fan you are, and ask her the question. Even better, tell her you have some anti-Islamic art...

HOUSEOFMALAISE---Again you added that lie about "at the end of the forum..." You also added misleading statements--that bit about allowing controversial work was NOT in reference to anything anti-Islam, yet you made it sound like it was. And why are you not wanting people to google for themselves? Why don't you want people going through the discussion? IF YOU PUT BACK IN THAT LIE ABOUT THE "END OF THE FORUM SLAUGHTER CHANGED HER MIND" I will do my best to get you kicked out of wikipedia. You know it's not true.

POV[edit]

This article is more a hitjob than an encyclopedic entry. Thier is too much emphasis on controversy surrounding her and those incidents are written with strong POV.

This article is indeed a hitjob. Someone clearly has an axe to grind with her for whatever reason. And whoever is contributing to this discussion also does a nice job of trying to smear anyone who tries to accurately correct wrong info (I guess the best defense is a good offense when your arguments lack credibility). Re: the art controversy a clear and accurate link/reference to the Princeton student newspaper article was included that quoted Slaughter directly. What else would you like, something written in blood? Sheesh! And BTW, someone else added the "google for more info" comment!


HOM First, HoM takes out any reference to "ricanstructions and that Slaughter admitted to a double standard (allows/promotes Christian desecration but not Islam desecration). When called out on that HoM initially adds the "Slaughter changer her mind and said she would allow anti-Islamic art" without any cite (despite HoM's claims here) to make it look like she does not hold a double standard.

When called out on that HoM responds only that the stories detailing Slaughter's double standard are partisan, which apparently then gives HoM the right to add back in that completely made up scenario. HoM basically says "well, quotes of what Slaughter said are appearing in partisan magazines so I may then completely invent quotes without any attribution. Look at the hisotry in Wikipedia and what HoM said. Look at the lack of cites.

Again, HoM gets called out, so HoM finally adds one cite that: 1. does not address the double standard statement Slaughter made. 2. does not say that she said anything "at the end of the forum" or that she had "changed her mind' about not allowing Islam desecration (again, the added cite does not even address Slaughter's admission to a double standard). It says that in relation to the aniti-Christian Slaughter at some point said to those opposed to the anti-Christian exhibit that she was sorry for THEIR "pain" but that she would allow art that offends some" if it was "educational". It has nothing to do with her "changing her mind" "at the end of the forum" about anti-Islam statements. That cite does not address Islam at all. It was added because HoM was called out repeatedly for inventing quotes and it was the only thing he/she/it could find. Slaughter was asked after saying she would allow the anti-Christian art to continue (which is what the forum was about) if she would allow anti-Islam art, and then she admitted she would not allow it. That's what everyone was pissed about. She did not all of a sudden "change her mind" about anti-Islam art during the time of the forum and then announce this "change" "at the end" and you know it. Everyone who wants to can read this and figure it out. Look at the history for this article, and look at the cite.

Perhaps the Dean would like to reveal this committe she promised back in 2003? Perhaps we can see their criteria for what is acceptable?

HoM, we also noticed you changing the controversy on her pro-war invitees. Who is the one with the agenda? What are you, some relative or student of hers? YOU took out the google reference because you don't want people to read the truth. How does that look that her associate (and you have got to know her, which I do not) is so dishonest?

And for the person who called this article a "hitjob", I noticed your Islam articles. I guess we know why you're defending her.

The controversies section clearly lacks a NPOV - someone is out to get this person for reasons one can only imagine. I've tried to update the art exhibit section several times, each time to more accurately reflect what actually occurred during the meeting as reported by Princeton's student newspaper (you know, a POV from an objective person WHO WAS THERE, vs. the conjecture going on via this bio page) and for someone to take offense or umbrage at an attempt to be accurate w/ references is flat-out wrong. Again, let's call attention to the fact that the controversies section is almost as long as the biography. There's an agenda or two being pushed here, which happens sometimes, just be accurate re: wiki standards about what you're claiming. Stop the guesswork and go w/ the verifiable facts.

Inappropriate comment[edit]

There is a rather inappopriate 'stepping stone' comment which has a phoney reference that I will be removing presently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.52.175.218 (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name is Unusual[edit]

Especially considering she has a husband and is using her maiden name, is it appropriate to mention this and is there a sourse to her talking about her name? Is it just trivia?Sanitycult (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some women use their maiden name to keep credit for prior scholarship and work. Some feminists do this as a matter of course. I will look for a third-party source when I have time. Geraldshields11 (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Early in her academic career she went by Anne-Marie Burley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.206.188 (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A search on 'Anne-Marie Burley' should certainly go to 'Anne-Marie Slaughter' as the influential article on the European Court of Justice she wrote with Walter Mattli, 'Europe Before the Court', was published under the former name. Anguisetleaena (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name being invoked in comparison with another author[edit]

I don't know if this one incident is worth including in the article - slate pointed to her in comparision to another author, apparently over women writing about work/life balance in an article called:"Candace Cameron Bure Wants to Balance Your Full House: Can the actress who played D.J. Tanner be the evangelical Anne-Marie Slaughter" http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/01/candace_cameron_bure_from_full_house_to_balancing_it_all.html

There was no other mention of her in the piece. --Wowaconia (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne-Marie Slaughter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anne-Marie Slaughter endorses violence[edit]

Can we add this specific line to the article? Slaughter has repeatedly called for and supported various armed conflicts as the article clearly states. A summary of her work therefore would be to summarize this endorsement it is clearly very significant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.153.97.155 (talk) 19:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anne-Marie_Slaughter&oldid=1207936764"