Talk:Anne Hyde/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I will get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Anne's married life was not exactly perfect. Nobody's life is perfect. Combine that sentence with the following one. Rephrase this: Mary of Modena, who offered James his only son, James Francis Edward and explain that he was the only son to survive to adulthood.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Use n-dash between page ranges in cites. Either provide publisher locations (preferred) or not for all books. Need OCLC # for Everett, Lister and Strickland.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Link Duchies of York and Albany in lede. Who are Edward Hyde and Clarendon? The same person? Also link if appropriate.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

All problems listed above are now solved :) --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)