Talk:Another World (video game)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FJ 1 (talk · contribs) 08:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this article. FJ 1 (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
In my opinion, CyberRoach is a weak source. It doesn't provide any direct information about the Atari Jaguar's port. GPATemp is a message board and shouldn't be used. Megidish.net is also a questionable source.These sources are now deleted FJ 1 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)The sources providing to magazines are imprecise (no site numbers), as well as the source providing to the manual.(Sorry, there's no need of precising them for GA FJ 1 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)). I found the lack of sources in the following sections:the overall 15th Anniversary re-release/(It's OK now. FJ 1 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC));too few in Legacy (maybe a source for this sentence: "Flashback… is often mistaken as a sequel to Another World because of similar gameplay and graphics."?); and lack of any sources in the Gameplay section. I would be also grateful if you can put the citations in the cite templates (but it's not necessary).It's much improved now FJ 1 (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)The content doesn't also explain the following sentence of the lead: "Another World was highly innovative in its use of cinematic effects in the graphics, sound and cut scenes, with characters communicating through their facial features, gestures and actions only."The sentence seems reorganized. FJ 1 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I removed a hell of repeating refs after every single sentence and now they're only sourcing whole paragraphs, unless another ref is used in-between. --Niemti (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I see that you have done much improvement, but the Gameplay section still remains unsourced
, and some references to the printed sources are still imprecise, too(I revert the latter, there is no need for GA FJ 1 (talk) 13:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)). FJ 1 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC) - After the second look, I see the article much improved. I have no further comments, so I pass the article. Good job! FJ 1 (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2012 (UTC)