Talk:Anpirtoline
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Group 19[edit]
Review #1
Your chembox and your information look really good! One thing that I noticed was some of your sources look like they were used more than once. For example, 3 and 4 look identical. All the information within the wiki looks good and the only thing I think I could suggest would be to add another section.
Nknelso2 (talk) 23:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC) Nicole Nelson
Review #2
This page is looking good, good chembox and a good amount of information. The individual sections are a bit short though, it may benefit from adding a little more to each section, or just adding more info in general to make the article a bit longer. Also, your references 6-8 all are the same thing, just letting you know.
Zack Gaertner
Gaertne2 (talk) 01:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Review #3
The page is off to a good start, especially the introduction section. One thing I noticed was the 'Chemical' section under properties. Melting point and boiling point are technically physical properties. Chemical properties are things like enthalpy of vaporizaiton and reactivity. Perhaps you could add a section on the specific reactions that anpirtoline hydrochloride go through, these Wiki pages are a lot more digestable with pictures of reactions. You could expand on your 'Uses' section (i.e. retrieve some more information from your references) and get some more pieces of physical data from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics for your Chembox.
Madnessxyz (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Rahul Gogia, NetID: gogia2
Review #4
Information in the introduction part and the chembox are quite comprehensive. However the individual sections look a bit too short, and you might also want to include the reaction section as well so that you could write more about how this compound would react with the others, and perhaps the mechanism involved to improve this page. Just for your reference, references 3,4 and 6,7,8 are all identical, it would be great if you could delete those redundant ones.
Mgieuw (talk) 04:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Matthew Gieuw NETID: gieuw2