This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to science and technology in Uruguay. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Antarctosaurus, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
I redid the references to make them the nice wiki style ones with all the bells and whistles. Please make sure I didn't make any mistakes while converting from the old "standard essay"-type citations. Thanks! <3 Abyssal leviathin (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that eggs from the Anecleto formation could belong to Wichmannianus? Because it said they found eggs there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.128.204.201 (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can a better taxobox image be found, the current one is horribly distorted, the neck connects below the elbow. It also looks pregnant! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.108.138.162 (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The image caption and the image description say A.giganteus; the file name, the plaque in the museum say A. wichmannianus? I'm struggling to find copies of the description, does anyone know which is correct? Steveoc 86 (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, on further reading it would seem that only A.giganteus is known from a pair of femurs which would imply the plaque is incorrect. Steveoc 86 (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
