Talk:Anti-clericalism in Latin America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scope[edit]

I don't know much about this either, but there seem to be two basic common movements: a) 19th & 20th century "Liberal" governments persecuting the Church, and b) 20th & 21st century right-wing governments persecuting all or at least the Liberation theology wing of the church. A quick scan of Óscar Romero and Lib theology suggests we don't have a general article on either a or b - though see Terrible Triangle, & the template at Romero. Should both aspects be covered here? Probably. Johnbod (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This should be as comprehensive as possible, I think. Xandar 02:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasons[edit]

The article should probably mention that much of this type of anti-clericalism has historically been associated with the Grand Orient branch of Freemasonry. It is quite obvious to historians of Ibero-American politics that many of Latin America's political leaders in the 19th century were Freemasons, even though 99 % of the colonial and native population was at least nominally Roman Catholic. For instance, Bernardo O'Higgins, Simon Bolivar, José Martí, Francisco de Paula Santander and Benito Juárez were all members of Masonic lodges, which is more than just a mere coincidence. ADM (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"acknowledge allegiance to"[edit]

I've added a citation tag as the claim that 90% of the population "acknowledge allegiance to the Catholic Church" clearly needs referencing. I take it this phrase refers to practising rather than baptised Catholics, in which case I'm a bit doubtful about its accuracy given the rise of evangelical Protestantism in Brazil for example.Haldraper (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anti-clericalism in Latin America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-clericalism in Latin America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright problem[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 01:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-clericalism_in_Latin_America&oldid=1209175704"