Talk:Antonello Bonci

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Edits made by the below user were last checked for neutrality on 22 September 2020byTJMSmith.

EnoughBLS123 (talk · contribs)

Someone is continuously reverting information about Bonci's sexual misconduct probe[edit]

User EnoughBLS123 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/EnoughBLS123), who only has edits for this article, is deleting any mention of the sexual misconduct probe that preceded Bonci's resignation from the National Institutes for Drug Abuse citing "libel".

However, there is plenty of sourcing and evidence to back up the statement that Bonci left the NIH after a sexual misconduct probe (which was not released or cited when he departed): - https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/11/science-chief-nih-drug-abuse-institute-resigned-after-sexual-misconduct-probe - https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/nih-official-resigned-after-sexual-misconduct-probe-66685

This information is also relevant and important for the article. Doctordestiny777 (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another article revert by same user[edit]

I have left a message on EnoughBLS123's user page with information about single-purpose accounts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Single-purpose_account

Doctordestiny777 (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading statement regarding alleged misconduct[edit]

"and the allegations of sexual misconduct were never attested". This statement cites the science and science magazine articles. The articles cited indicate that Bonci resigned after the investigation probe. The results of probe were not disclosed. There is no indication in the references that the allegations were never attested. While this might be the case, the statement mislead the reader to believe that the allegations were indeed not proven true. I think that a more neutral stance would be "the results of the probe were not disclosed". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.83.116 (talk) 00:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A List of 84 Publications?[edit]

Is it appropriate to straight-out list 84 published papers? This seems {{overly detailed}}. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FishAndChips36 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI edits on this article[edit]

It seems that there are at least 2 accounts trying to change this article to hide mention of Bonci's sexual misconduct probe in 2019; if you look up in the talk page this was noted in 2020 in relation to User:EnoughBLS123, and recently User:YVA123 has been doing a similar thing. Given the similarity in the usernames, I wouldn't be surprised if these are the same person. Medarduss (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a colleague of Dr. Bonci's and wish to disclose that COI. He has asked me to help him figure out "what to do" with this page and I am trying to present to him what his options are with the information he disputes and wishes not to be on his page. Please excuse my naivete with Wickipedia ... at this point, I want to check to see if I understand how to resolve this. While there is dispute with the publications, I understand that Wikipedia is not the forum to debate this. If the information is published by a credible source, it's fair game to present. Therefore, is there an opportunity for him to craft an entry which cites the article reviewing his departure from NIS? Is this something to be sorted out directly with an editor such as yourself? Duluth.bishop (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]