Talk:Anurag Kashyap/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kailash29792 (talk · contribs) 14:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll post my comments within 24 hours. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • "After writing few news paper articles and a television serial" - Please rephrase. For which paper did he write, and which TV serial?
The TV serial is Kabhie Kabhie, its mentioned below. I should remove "few news paper articles", because found it in a video on youtube, where he mentions this.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 9:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • "Paanch, which is yet unreleased regarding censorship issues" - But the film did get a screening at some festival per this source.
The film has been screened at a film festival, but haven't been theatrically released.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 9:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • The lead section needs no sources. But the same content must be sourced in the body.
Where I should include this line "He has received acclaim.."? Because its the only line which is sourced.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
"He has received acclaim for his often realistic films, and is regarded as the face of an emerging new wave cinema for producing numerous independent films with newcomers.[1][2][3]" - this statement, along with its sources, may fit either in "accolades" or "influences". But it can remain in the lead without sources.Kailash29792 (talk) 01:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Background and career[edit]

  • Does any other GA/FA use a title like this? If not, please try and split it. Because it looks absurd.
Done.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • "On January 16, 2015, it was released in United States on selected theatres" - Gangs of Wasseypur part 1 or 2? Or both?
Rephrased.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • this section appears too over-detailed and convoluted; can you try adding sub-headings? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done.--Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

I have checked the whole article, seems well written. In its current state, the article is worth passing. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]