Talk:Apostolic Church of South Africa – Apostle Unity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Kerkman,

you write that some information is not correct. Which one? Pls specify! Thx. Taurus65 (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I wonder if there are any better sources for this topic. Perhaps a member of the Church can offer some input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manofmyth (talkcontribs) 19:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I wonder if anyone has more information on the internal politics of this Church. It seems that the information is a bit skewed in one direction at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manofmyth (talkcontribs) 20:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry those last two posts are mine Manofmyth (talk) 20:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been in Cape Town 2 weeks ago and attended a service. I agree with Manofmyth that the amendments of the text are very "one direction". Should be neutralised and subsidised under a new paragraph "critics" instead of "administration". Would be great if someone could give more info. --Taurus65 (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four Rs[edit]

Does anyone know if there is a reason that the Rs are capitalized? If that is how it is used by them then it is fine but it shouldn't be like that for emphasis.Leefkrust22 (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violiation[edit]

I am not 100% sure but it seems that the section under Administration might be a copyright violation. Googling the paragraph brings up the above mentioned URL. The text itself also shows that there might be a copy and paste, i.e. "This is in line with comments published previously on this website but deleted since" ShiningWolf (talk) 18:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Apostolic Church of South Africa – Apostle Unity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]