Talk:Application domain

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Microsoft: .NET Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject .NET (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Application Domain → Application domain –

It's downcased in the opening sentence of the article text! Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. $Tony (talk)$ 14:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support – books commonly have it in lower case; so should we. But first we have to merge Application domain into Problem domain (or just get rid of it, as it seems to be an incoherent stub). Dicklyon (talk) 06:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Any real performance data?[edit]

I suspect that there is very little difference between app domains and real processes. The unmanaged aspect is scary. Anyone know? Tuntable (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation needed[edit]

One has to disambiguate between Application domain-the .NET Technology-and application domain-a software area sharing commonalities(or problem domain)-. I suggest the creation of a wiki for Application domain(Problem Domain) and a different one for Application domain(.NET technology). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.219.236.213 (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]