Talk:April 2007 nor'easter

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Quebec / Ottawa Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Low-importance).

Weather: Non-tropical / Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Non-tropical storms task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Low-importance).

April 2007 nor'easter was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 10, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Page Name[edit]

At least here in Maine, it was being referred to as the "Patriot's Day Nor'Easter." Thoughts? --Auto^{(talk / contribs)} 20:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do think it has an official name, thus there are different labels, either nondescript such as Spring or April Nor'easter, or apparently at different locales also Patriot's Day or Tax Day Nor'easter, - however it lasted more than one day.Ekem 21:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those extra names should be redirects. CrazyC83 22:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the seemingly widespread impact of the storm, maybe it should be called April 2007 North American Complex or Storm Complex (dependent on how it is usually named)--JForget 19:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least in my area, it was known by some people as the "Tax Day nor'easter". I have tried to creat a page named "Tax Day Nor'easter", but it was deleted. Any thoughts on other names? Juliancolton 16:42, 19, October 2007

Severe weather ahead of the storm[edit]

Should they be part of the article, even though it was not a Nor'easter at the time they happened? CrazyC83 22:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can definitely add the tornadoes that were part of the storm from Texas to South Carolina - it was also within the same storm. I've also added storm effects in Canada as it was not just a US storm--JForget 19:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

damage[edit]

I have some newspapers I kept with lots of damage info and even damage estimates, so I'll add those when I can. icelandic hur ric ane #12 _(talk) 11:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a seperate article about the damage and effects of this storm? Juliancolton 16:44, 19, October 2007

This is true, it is 1 March 2008 and this storm happened almost 11 months ago. I remember it clearly, I think the basement flooded, and that is what happened with most people. Some, unfortunately had the first floor of their house flooded, which is a big problem, esprcially if they don't have a floor on top of that one. They can hide in the basement, i guess, unless that flooded, too. Also, I heard that one lady died because her car went out of control on a sharp turn and the car went into the woods and she died :(. (Hey that sort of reminds me of the College Road Trip commercial only no one died.). --RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 12:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC) PS no there shouldn't be a separate article, it would be a waste.[reply]

Yea, I can't find enough information for a seperate article, anyway. Juliancolton (Talk) 13:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 11, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Neutral. Several unexplained acronyms, but overall not bad. However, the impact is very cluttered

2. Factually accurate?: Neutral. Three unsourced statements

3. Broad in coverage?: Fail. This article is supposed to be about the nor'easter, but it also deals with earlier aspects of the storm; for example, was the tornado death in South Carolina part of the nor'easter? The storm history is too short, as it doesn't deal with the entire history of the storm. Additionally, there are several important facts missing. How much damage did it cause? Was there any aftermath/preparations?

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

Consistency in units are needed. Good luck improving it in the future.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on April 2007 nor'easter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on April 2007 nor'easter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on April 2007 nor'easter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025005910/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=46334f84-3568-4ec3-bd79-fd1832fea92b&k=65206 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=46334f84-3568-4ec3-bd79-fd1832fea92b&k=65206
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thnt.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070416%2FNEWS%2F70416009
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0%2C%2Cid%3D169523%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on April 2007 nor'easter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Nor'easter which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]