Talk:April 2014 Iraqi–Syrian border airstrike

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the April 2014 Iraqi–Syrian border airstrike redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Middle East

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Iraq Low‑importance

	Iraq portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syria Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Iraqi insurgency (2011–present)[edit]

A single airstrike event is too narrow a scope, unlikely to be found Legacypac (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I agree. A single airstrike is certainly not notable enough to warrant its own article. But we have to make sure that all of the information in that article makes it into this one. LightandDark2000 (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac:, if you have the time, can you please carry out the merger? It's been over 2 weeks with no new comments or opposition, so I believe that the merge should be carried out soon. LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support EkoGraf (talk) 17:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]