Talk:Arab occupation of the Palestinian region

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Arab occupation of the Palestinian region redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Middle East

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Palestine High‑importance

	Palestine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation[edit]

This article is a translation of the parallel article in the Hebrew Wikipedia. Acidburn24m (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What in the World?[edit]

This article is stupid. It has obviously had very little work done on it. There are random irrelevant facts thrown in. It is very short. It's full of grammatical errors. If this article is not fixed, it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.128.54 (talk) 16:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The article is complete nonsense. But given its origin, that's hardly surprising. ♆ CUSH ♆ 07:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this article could use some work[edit]

due to lack of time on my part, i only added a little bit info to this page, and didn't cite any sources. i hope someone else could spruce up this page for me. --Crossovershipper (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim conquest of Syria[edit]

This "article" has been unsourced for a long time. Does anyone disagree with redirecting it to Muslim conquest of Syria? It seems to be what that article is about. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 04:52, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i guess you could do that if you want--Crossovershipper (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. And maybe the original article is changed as well. To use modern nomenclature for events in the 7th century CE shows very well the political inclination and purpose of the original article. Muslims conquered Syria. Period. And with less violence than commonly thought. "occupation" has a completely different legal quality that applies rather to what Jews do in Palestine in the 20th and 21st centuries. Palaestina is not identical in meaning to "Palestinian region" of the 20th century.

So please go on with the move. It's a big correction. ♆ CUSH ♆ 08:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]