Talk:Archie vs. Predator/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 04:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

This sounds so ridiculous and amazing that I have to review it. Aoba47 (talk) 04:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• Expand the lead. The lead should be a comprehensive outline of the article. Make sure to include information from the “Publication history” section and “Reception” section.
• Add “and” between “limited series comic book” and “intercompany crossover”
• I would make the part about the publication into its own sentence and add where it was originally published (I assume the United States) and in what format (hardcover, soft cover, etc.). If this change is made, then add “and” between Campi and “drawn” and remove the comma. These changes would help with clarity.
• The image in the infobox needs an alt.

Changes made, but I'm not sure how to do the alt for the image. Let me know if it should be expanded further.

• @Argento Surfer: The lead still needs to be expanded.I would encourage you to expand to include more elements from the “Publication history” section and “Reception” section. For instance, indicate aspects about the comic that critics praised and also discuss how this comic came out of a history of unusual crossovers with Archie. As for the alt, look at an example like A Contract with God to see how to add it to an infobox. Let me know if you have any further questions. Aoba47 (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

• I've expanded it more. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Development

• Is there a reason why “GLEE” is capitalized? I have never seen the show’s title stylized that way, but if the comic title is like that then keep it.
• Remove the excessive citing of the second reference in the first paragraph. You only need the citation for the last sentence.
• Rework the first sentence of the second paragraph to avoid the repetitions of “Dark Horse”
• I would move the reference for the last sentence of the second paragraph to the end of the sentence.
• Add a space between “storyarc”
• This is just a suggestion, but I would change either “happier” or “happy” since they are in close proximity to each other.

Changes made.

Publication

• For the first sentence of the second paragraph, I would include the date of the last publication.
• Add a citation for the second paragraph. Citations are needed for the dates and the information on the humorous strip.

Changes made

Plot

• I would eliminate “While there” as it is an awkward transition
• Remove the comma after “a picture of the creature”
• Otherwise, great work here!

Changes made

Reception

• I would restructure this section to put all the information on the sales in one paragraph and all the information on the critical reception in another so I would suggest moving the information on the ComicBookRoundUp to the second paragraph.

Changes made

References

• Great references; for the future, I would encourage you to archive your electronic sources to avoid any dead or broken links in the future
• For references 1, 4, 8, and 9, take out the all caps and write the titles normally.

Changes made, and thanks for the tip!

Final comments

• @Argento Surfer: Great job with this article! Let me know if you have any questions or comments about my review. Once my comments are addressed, this should be a quick and easy pass. Aoba47 (talk) 04:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

  @Argento Surfer: Thank you for addressing my comments so quickly. You have done a great job with this article; as soon as you address my above comment about the Lead and Infobox, I will pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 03:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

  @Argento Surfer: Great job with expanding the lead. ✓ Pass Aoba47 (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: