Talk:ArchitectureWeek

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Notability[edit]

Took out the notability and references tags based on third-references added. Hope that wasn't premature! Greenineugene (talk) 20:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Endorsing the addition of the category "Magazines published in Oregon", I also reinstated the category "American magazines" in parallel with the broadly comparable entry for the monthly architecture magazine Architectural Record. One of these categories applies to the locality from which the magazine is published, and the other refers to the geographic emphasis of content. Confusion around these arises because the two categories are typically the same for local/regional magazines, so it seems the can be collapsed. But they are not necessarily the same at all for national/international magazines, so for these, perhaps both categories are actually meaningful. Greenineugene (talk) 20:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ArchitectureWeek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727122152/http://www.scup.org/blog/scuplinks/2009/02/this-is-nice-review-of-restored-art.html?id=2 to http://www.scup.org/blog/scuplinks/2009/02/this-is-nice-review-of-restored-art.html?id=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]