Talk:Archival appraisal

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 14 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Historyhermann1993.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Davidc2070. Peer reviewers: Wmkalbach.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

There's no citations to much of the information cited here :(.Efkeathley 23:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Efkeathley, if you would like to add anything, feel free to do so. I made some substantial edits and added a few images, but as a fellow archivist, you may have more to add to this.Historyhermann1993 (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight?[edit]

I'm thinking this article requires a more complete list of appraisal theories but less of a dichotomy since macro appraisal and documentation strategy are more in agreement with each other than say the Black Box and Functional Analysis. I'd define micro versus macro appraisal and how they relate to Functional Analysis, Boles and Young's Black Box, and reappraisal as a part of collection management. Thoughts? Levelistchampion (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly you are no longer on here, but I agree the page could be improved.Historyhermann1993 (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archival appraisal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New changes as of May 1, 2019[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians. As the de facto steward of this wonderful page, I made some substantial edits to this page in hopes of making it better, including two images from other articles on the same topic and the best image on archival appraisal I could find from Wikimedia. I hope others can add information about Carol Couture, François Burgy, and Daniel Ducharme mentioned in the German-language article. That would be appreciated. Historyhermann1993 (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]