Talk:Arizona's 5th congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

There is a big problem with this page; the 5th Dist (before 2003) was in southeastern AZ (now 8th dist). The way that the article is currently presented implies that Jim Kolbe and Jim McNulty represented Scottsdale and Tempe, when, in fact, they always represented SE AZ.66.210.57.10 (talk) 00:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's another big problem here. The results for the 2008 congresstional election is wrong. The listing for the Democratic Party candidate (Harry Mitchell) is correct. But the Republican Party candidate was David Schweikert, the Libertarian Party candidate was Warren Severin, and there was no independent candidate (I don't know who Frank Hayworth or Nick Gonzales are, but they didn't run for Congress here in CD5). I didn't edit the page because I don't know what the vote totals are. Nickcoons (talk) 03:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up finding the election results here (http://www.azsos.gov/results/2008/general/GEN-1005.htm) and updated the page with the correct information. Nickcoons (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arizona's 5th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]