Talk:Arizona State Route 347

Arizona State Route 347 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 10, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Arizona Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Arizona

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in May 2012.

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arizona State Route 347/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 03:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Thank you for nominating this article. No disamb. links or invalid external links.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
"where the a farm appears" - delete "the"
Done. --P C B 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"about 33,000 vehicles used the route on an average day." - can you say at what point on the route?
Done --P C B 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

What about adding Harrah's casino to the route description?
What evidence do you have of this? Harrah's casino seems to be in San Diego. --P C B 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --P C B 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Official website and map shows address as 15406 Maricopa Road, Maricopa, AZ 85239.

Please add to the route description the at grade rail crossing just before W Maricopia Casa Grande Hwy.
Where? Can you give me a source? --P C B 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ref #3.

Done --P C B 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I believe I have fixed all errors. --P C B 04:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick responses. One final point and we are done — why does the lead paragraph say 40,000 vehicles per day, but the highest total in the body of the article is only 33,000 vehicles? Thanks! Racepacket (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want the lead to be less specific. In addition, the AADT is higher elsewhere. --P C B 04:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation and congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]