Talk:Arnold Geulincx

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Logic / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Metaphysics
	Logic
	Modern philosophy

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Beckett[edit]

References to Beckett are of little worth (nihil velis).Lestrade (talk) 20:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Points for humor; but Geulincx wouldn't be of much interest today if Beckett hadn't read him.-FM (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)FM[reply]

Maybe we should remove the Beckett reference at the beginning of the article because it is repeated at the end of the article.173.72.63.96 (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Scott Palmström[reply]

Ita est[edit]

Ita est, ergo ita sit. Is this really accurately translated by "It exists, therefore it is so"? I can think of a dozen ways to translate this phrase, but the translation given is not one of them.

It is so, so let it be so.
Yes it is, therefore it may be so.

Et cetera. A context for the quote will be necessary to determine what its meaning is, but I don't see any context that can make it "It exists, therefore it is so". Rwflammang (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]