Talk:Arrow information paradox

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Invention Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Is this really a paradox?[edit]

Is this really a paradox though? I mean, let's say I tell a person I know who really killed JFK and I'll tell who it was for a certain price. All the customer has to know is that I have the information, not what the actual information is. I could very well just not be understanding the terms of this paradox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.69.109.132 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One definition of paradox is "a situation which defies intuition". Intuition is subjective, so what is "really" a paradox is subjective, too. If reliable sources call it a paradox, a paradox it is. Paradoctor (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the point is, (in theory) you have to fully understand the technology in order BEFORE you can decide if you want to buy it...but by virtue of fully "understanding" it (leaving aside the difference between understanding and ability to replicate/mass produce), you have effectively acquired the technology WITHOUT buying it. Therefore a contradiction. --68.173.110.247 (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrow information paradox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thebhc.org/awards/bakker_gomory.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130202155425/http://www.texaslrev.com/wp-content/uploads/Burstein.pdf to http://www.texaslrev.com/wp-content/uploads/Burstein.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]