Talk:Arthouse action film

Sources[edit]

Please do not add films or content to this list without a source. It requires one per WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:SUBJECTIVE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  87.169.179.51 (talk) 13:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC) You basically just turned what was before a very useful compendium into a dead article. And you didn't even bother to include half the movies that the sole reference you cite lists - why?[reply]

Because most of the sourced items didn't say they were arthouse action. As stated above, most of it was original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. You need sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, editor Could you please send me a previous copy of the list, I beg of you, this edit was indeed absurd. Editing is one thing but butchering one of my favorite articles because of some vague and misguided bureaucratic regulations is far from necessary. You don't even include films that the lists you cite include, which I find to be an absolutely inane practice. Just because you want to follow rules doesn't make your fascistic axing of hours of work any better. Instead of providing valuable information, this article is now on the verge of death, so much for editing for quality. Here I sit typing away, trying (most likely in vain since you seem dead set in your ways) to expose the idiocy of the recent edits to this article while you remove hours of someone's work. Their work wasn't lies. 71.81.50.199 (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Someone who actually cares about content and the people who write these articles in the first place[reply]

If you don't want your work removed, find sources. I don't think I missed any, but if you find reliable sources. Currently, we don't take in original research. Either way, your old content can be found here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthouse action film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111102185521/http://blogs.indiewire.com/thompsononhollywood/2011/03/31/hanna_early_reviews/ to http://blogs.indiewire.com/thompsononhollywood/2011/03/31/hanna_early_reviews/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]