Talk:Arthur Birch (colonial administrator)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mount Birch[edit]

Although "Birch, Mount". BC Geographical Names. says it was named "after a local settler who died a few years before 1957", I'd never heard that before; I authored the bivouac.com reference given, when I worked/volunteered at the CME, and had garnered from somewhere that he was the namesake of this summit; the text from the British Columbia Chronicle by Helen and GPV Akrigg given in that reference gives more information about his career in BC, and his countenace/description; I no longer haev that book or would quote the entire passage here; what's visible on Bivouac is only partial unless you sign for full membership. Birch was a critical figure in colonial British Columbia; the governor, though a nice fellow, was an alcoholic, manic-depressive incompetent and the colony would have collapsed without Birch....Skookum1 (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

The current style of sourcing looks frankly speaking rather idiotic. It might not be intended that way but the current seems to suggest that there 11 sources to source a single uncontroversial sentence while the rest of the content seems unsourced. If all sources do source the rest of the article as well, the footnotes should distributed appropriately to indicate that (place then at the end of the sentence or at least at the end of the parapragraph the content of which they are sourcing). If however they do indeed only source that single line, they should be reduced. For uncontroversial material usually 1 or 2 sources/footnotes are good enough, there is definitely no need for 11.--Kmhkmh (talk) 08:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Birch (colonial administrator). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]