Talk:Asa Lovejoy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asa Lovejoy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Asa Lovejoy has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 17, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Oregon High‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Source for expansion/citations[edit]

For info on the founding of Portland: Terry, John. Oregon's Trails: A Stark Tale of Ascendancy, Bitterness, then Goodbye. The Oregonian, October 12, 2003. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pre review comments[edit]

The article looks good. One minor issue in the last section: "Lovejoy was also influential in business." It doesn't let the facts speak for themselves. I'd like to see some more detail into his business dealings (facts to speak for the influential).User:calbear22 (talk) 05:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pass GA[edit]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Note: I still think it would be nice to see more information about the business ventures in his later years and some expansion of the final section to better meet section length guidelines (although the section is by no means too short to fail the guidelines). But, seeing that Lovejoy died over a hundred years ago, (and I looked at some of the sources in the final section) it seems unrealistic to demand more from that section to pass GA review for an article that is very good quality. Congratulations on a good article.User:calbear22 (talk) 19:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I was working on that when you passed it, and will see if there is anything else to add with an eye towards a possible FA. If everything was online and search able it would make writing these things a lot easier, damn internet! ;) Aboutmovies (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]