Talk:Ashton Music

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled[edit]

Ashtom Music is so dominant in Australian guitar sales, I thought it deserved a Wikipedia entry.

Because the Australis Music Group (the parent company of Ashton Music) has a website that is Flash based, I could only link to the front page of it. Ideally, I would have provided a reference to the exact text that said it is the leading brand in Australia in unit terms. However, I could not do this with a Flash based website where there is no address for discreet pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lester (talk • contribs)

It certainly deserves an article, but I've decided to start again rather than restore the CSD'd version. Feel free to contribute to it. Andrewa (talk) 01:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the flash website is a bloomin' pain! I wonder whether the website designer ever considered that most modern browsers are tab-based, and that most people want to be able to follow a link to a new tab, leaving the old page open too, when they choose to?

It's a classic example of a site that looks great in the boardroom, but actually loses the company customers in practice. Andrewa (talk) 01:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]