Talk:Asprise OCR

Notability[edit]

It is being used, and mentioned in some research papers (about <40 Google Scholar hits). I am not convinced this passes Wikipedia:Notability_(software)#Inclusion, as I am not sure if it is used widely. But for now we can discuss it, since the author is active and willing to look for sources. I am currently leaning towards merging this to a List of OCR software, however. @Ocr-ninja: --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotr, more sources (mainly books) have been added to demonstrate that it meets the following two notability criteria: 1) The software is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field; 2) The software is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs.

Especially for 2), it is not "merely used in instruction" as many researchers not only use it, but also analyze its workflow, implementation and modify it to create innovative solutions. @Piotrus:

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asprise OCR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]