Talk:Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena

Midlands Ghost Research Society was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 November 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hundreds of references[edit]

Just in case anyone is wondering why there are 21 sources in an article this short - information about the group tends to take up 2 paragraphs of a 9 paragraph article. Seeing as they've been around for 20+ years, lot of the information overlaps (lovely for verifiability but...) - so each sources refers to a single notable thing. There could've been 40 references, but I thought one for each fact was enough to ensure proof of notability and veracity of statements. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]