Talk:Association of Publishing Agencies

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

I order you to clean up this article NOW![edit]

To whoever posted this article: Please clean it up. Joe407 (talk) 12:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and notablility[edit]

Please don't think I'm in anyway connected to the guy who put this article up. I saw it on recent changes and said... Interesting!!

With a quick search or two I've found:

Now I do agree with Orangemike that the clown who posted this did not understand WP or its policies. But the org is still notable. It just needs clean-up. Joe407 (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs MAJOR clean-up. The organization is probably notable, but there are no valid references posted to support any of the fact-based content. Also, the entire thing reads like a marketing brochure. The situation has existed since August 2009! I don't know what to do, as I know nothing about this subject matter. Anyone out there? Joe407 (talk)? My good buddy Orangemike? Anyone? --FeralOink (talk) 16:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Association of Publishing Agencies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]