Talk:Assyrians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I think it'd be much simpler to be labeled as Assyrians instead of Assyiran people. It's much easier to reference and more appropriate.

Yes by all means! One should be merged into the other - but which title is better of the two? //Big Adamsky 18:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Cleanup[edit]

There has just been a huge cleanup withing the last fifteen minutes: Aramaeans, Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Syriacs now have their own page! I tried putting them all into one page, but it didn't work out too well, but to link them all together, there is a {{Syriac Christianity}} at the bottum of all of the pages. --Domthedude001 18:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

I'm deleting this page so that I can have Assyrian people moved to Assyrians.

The correct way to move a page that needs administrator's assistance is to list it at WP:RM. If you follow the procedure, that should create a voting page for community consensus. --Gareth Hughes 17:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If it's likely to be uncontroversial, though, an admin can just go ahead and do it without there being a vote. --Angr (t·c) 19:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

I propose dealing with the history of the Assyrian people under the article with that name, and possibly transferring paragraphs concering their ancient state to Assyrian Empire. Having a separate entry on ancient Assyrians seems redundant to me. Big Adamsky 19:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good Idea, Go for it! --Domthedude001 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think most of the info on the article is redundant.[edit]

I've done some cleaning but wow talk about bias and self glorification of one's race. I belong to it but what the hell.

Disambiguation page[edit]

Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page leading to both the Assyrian empire and Assyrian people of today? Funkynusayri 11:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]