Talk:Astore (city)

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani cities.

Requested move 18 July 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: pages not moved to the proposed titles at this time, per the discussion below; there is no agreement in the current discussion that there is a primary topic for the term "Astore". Dekimasuよ! 01:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Astore (city) → Astore~~
Astore → Astore (disambiguation)

– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The district, river, and valley are named after the main city in the area, called "Astore". Khestwol (talk) 20:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. What about the other entry in the disambiguation page? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Added move of dab. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments, Kautilya3 and In ictu oculi. I have changed my mind. Now I think "Astore" should be made a redirect to "Astore District", the most viewed page according to the Pageviews Analysis. Khestwol (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - That is not the point. The dab page also lists "Italian ship Astore", which you have completely ignored. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The Italian ship was included in the pageviews link above, and its views are negligible. – Uanfala (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no primary among these meanings. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, after an analysis, I found that Astore District gets most of the pageviews. For example in the last 90 days, "Astore District" gets 5,029 views out of the total 7,452 for all the 5 pages combined. So I have changed my mind. I think we can make "Astore" a redirect to "Astore District". Khestwol (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No primary topic. Pageviews by themselves are at best only a very indirect indicator of usage (in this particular case: the district may get a lot of the views, but it's relatively less likely to be referred to by the unqualified term "Astore" than the city). The clickthroughs from the dab page are more relevant here [1]: for the last month, the city got 20 clicks, which accounts for less than half of the total visits to the dab, while no other topic got more than 10. – Uanfala (talk) 09:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But 20 is a very small monthly sample size, considering that "Astore District" was viewed as much as 5,029 times in the last three months. Khestwol (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 clicks for the city is small, but the number of clicks for the district (whatever it is: all we know is that it was below 10) was at least twice as small. Article views (like your figure of 5,029) only weakly correlate with usage, as only a tiny proportion of them are due to readers searching directly on Wikipedia. – Uanfala (talk) 20:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.